The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has recently made a significant decision, voting to remove the long-standing national limit on the number of television stations a single entity can own. This move, passed with a 2-1 vote, is anticipated to face legal challenges, yet it marks a notable shift in the regulatory landscape for major broadcasters.

Details of the Regulatory Shift and Reactions

On August 6, 2026, the FCC, with Chairman Brendan Carr and Commissioner Olivia Trusty casting affirmative votes, abolished the restriction rooted in 1940s radio ownership rules. Commissioner Anna Gomez, the sole dissenting voice, vehemently argued that the commission's action is "unlawful on its face." She emphasized that the existing 39% audience reach cap for U.S. TV households was established by Congress in 2012, implying that only Congress has the authority to alter it.

Chairman Carr countered Gomez's interpretation, aligning with the National Association of Broadcasters (NAB) and other industry advocates. He contended that television station owners have been constrained by outdated regulations, unlike digital behemoths such as Google, Netflix, Meta, and Amazon, which operate globally without similar limitations.

In his prepared remarks, Carr asserted, "It is time to restore balance to the broadcast airwaves. Repealing the national cap will provide essential relief for local broadcasters by restoring a healthy counterbalance to the growing leverage of national programmers." He further elaborated that increased scale would enable broadcasters to attract necessary capital and advertising revenue, crucial for sustaining and producing trustworthy, community-focused news and programming. Carr drew a parallel with the local newspaper industry's decline, cautioning against repeating similar mistakes that could jeopardize local broadcast television.

Carr criticized past FCC rules, particularly those limiting cross-ownership of TV stations and newspapers in major markets, suggesting they may have inadvertently contributed to the demise of local daily news. He remarked on the political difficulty of addressing such issues, noting, "It is always easier to say something must be done while doing nothing."

Conversely, Commissioner Gomez issued a detailed statement outlining her legal objections. She reiterated that the 39% national audience reach cap is enshrined in federal law, making any unilateral change by the FCC beyond its legal purview. Gomez cited Republican figures, including former FCC Commissioner Mike O’Rielly and former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (who negotiated the 39% compromise), all of whom concur that the FCC lacks the authority to modify the cap. Senate Commerce Chair Ted Cruz also expressed skepticism regarding changes without congressional action.

The elimination of this cap has been a long-standing objective for the NAB, the leading lobbying organization for broadcasters in the U.S. Curtis LeGeyt, President and CEO of NAB, expressed strong approval, stating, "The FCC's decision to eliminate the outdated national television ownership cap marks a generational step toward strengthening local stations and ensuring they can compete in today's media marketplace." LeGeyt commended Carr and the Commission for acknowledging that decades-old rules should not hinder local broadcasters' ability to invest in journalism, innovation, and community service, ultimately fostering a more equitable media landscape.

This landmark decision by the FCC could reshape the future of television broadcasting, empowering larger media conglomerates while sparking vigorous debate about regulatory authority and media consolidation.